THESE RECORDINGS ARE ALL PART OF THE HCSC COURT RECORDS.

THE COURTS HAVE TWICE AJUDICATED THEM TO BE AUTHENTIC AND THEY ARE PERFECTLY LEGAL.

According to Judge James Barry Jr., if a person is found dead with a recording device on his dead body containing a recording of the killer killing him, that recording can be used as evidence to convict the killer of murder. However, according to Judge James Barry Jr., if that same person records the killer threatening to kill him and has the temerity and audacity to live through it, the person being threatened with death and dismemberment should be prosecuted for multiple felonies for recording the killer and distributing the recordings to law enforcement officers. The decision by Judge James Barry Jr. effectively protects the killer and extortionist and punishes the victim. This is madness gone mad in the NH legal system.

 

“They will treat you like a criminal. They will dream up charges against you.”

 

Informant #4 – “He’s talking about chumming people”.

 

Worry about somebody shooting you” at the hands of police gunfire.

 Send the Goffstown Fire Dept. to burn you out. Finish the job they started.

Extortion

Death threats – “Few precious moments left on Earth”

Get rid of Dr. Hieber

“Bombs with gas in it”

“Letting Steckowych off of the hook”

“Statute of limitations”

How "these guys" go about poisoning whistleblowers.

 

  According to these following State and Federal statutes the recordings are legal.

 

According to the NH Breach of Peace Statutes, not only are these recordings are perfectly legal, I was actually doing what was expected of me as a conscientious citizen.

According to the US Constitution these recordings are perfectly legal.

According to the NH Constitution, these recordings are perfectly legal.

According to the 1986 Whistleblower Protection Act these recordings are perfectly legal.

According to the arson statutes, these recordings are perfectly legal.

According to the self-defense statutes, these recordings are perfectly legal.

According to the reasonable expectation of privacy laws these recordings are perfectly legal.

 

After I filed a complaint against Steckowych in February 2005 with the NH Supreme Court Attorney Discipline Office, a court order was issued to not speak about it under the penalty of law. Mr. Janigan contacted me to let me know that he was now “moving ahead” because I reneged on the letter extorted out of me under the threat of death by filing a complaint against Prosecutor Kerry Steckowych. The hit contract postponed on 12-13-2004 has now been reinstated.

 

“Moving ahead” on the hit contract on Gerard Beloin by Prosecutor Kerry Steckowych for speaking out against him.

 

“Kickbacks”

 

“Do the right thing. It’s not always easy to do the right thing”

 

Transcripts of all the recordings (court records)

 

       Informant: "He's talking about he's got a buddy out in the f***in boat in Gloucester. He's got a big 100 ft. f***ing fishing boat. He's talking about chumming people. He don't give a f**k.  He's just the guy to do it man. I know his family. They're all crazy and they want a shot at whatever is going on so."

 

       GB: "Why did he run in the first place?"

 

       Informant: "He knows. Something happened. He knows something. And. Basically he's being threatened."

 

       GB: "Threatened to kill him."

 

       Informant: "He went somewhere to Jersey, I guess, to see some family members. He said, I guess they're politicians and they're, they're Italian. They basically said. Somebody bothers you, we have people that take care of that."

 

       GB: "They're politicians??"

 

       Informant: "Go back home. Go back home. You let us know what happens. Spread the word that” …………………………….

         The informant then goes on to name the politicians.

 

2005-04-21 - In the case of Prosecutor Kerry Steckowych V Gerard Beloin, Judge Philip Mangones refused to listen to the recordings where Prosecutor Steckowych’s “personal messenger” admits to the of crimes of extortion, arson and murder with promises of more of the same against this defendant, then rules against this defendant saying that these perfectly legal recordings can not be used in a court of law to sue Prosecutor Steckowych. The case was immediately overturned by NH Supreme court Justice Richard E. Galway after he listened to the recordings.

 

2006-06-09 - Case is Dismissed with prejudice.

 

2006-06-09 - Transcripts of dismissal

 

 “Dismissed With Prejudice” is a final binding decision where the charges can never be reinstated

 

2007-05-04 - Judge Barry denies dismissal with prejudice

 

2007-05-04 - Judge Barry refuses to listen to the recordings

 

2007-10-16 - In the case of the St. Lawrence Parish V Gerard Beloin, Judge McGuire and Judge Barry used the tag team approach to body slam the truth and the evidence. They both refused to listen to the recordings of a prominent St. Lawrence Parishioner threatening the most heinous crimes against me and then ruled in favor of the parish.

 

         Please read these 60 pages of Testimonial letters in chronological order.   The letters are from Drs., Architects, Engineers, Roofing Consultants, Lawyers, NH Supreme Court Justices, NH Superior Court Judges, US Senators, US Congressmen, NH State Reps, Goffstown Building Committee members and tax payer advocates as well as friends and family members. There are nearly a dozen sworn affidavits attesting to the veracity of my allegations.